<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 384 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113402</link>
    <description>The court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, proposed by the company. Despite objections from creditors, the court found the scheme just, fair, and beneficial to shareholders, as preference and equity shareholders had unanimously approved it. The court dismissed creditor objections, emphasizing the scheme&#039;s non-prejudicial nature to shareholders&#039; interests. Ultimately, the court allowed the company&#039;s petition, rejecting creditor objections and directing the Registrar to draw the necessary order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 384 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113402</link>
      <description>The court sanctioned the Scheme of Arrangement under section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956, proposed by the company. Despite objections from creditors, the court found the scheme just, fair, and beneficial to shareholders, as preference and equity shareholders had unanimously approved it. The court dismissed creditor objections, emphasizing the scheme&#039;s non-prejudicial nature to shareholders&#039; interests. Ultimately, the court allowed the company&#039;s petition, rejecting creditor objections and directing the Registrar to draw the necessary order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>