https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113393 The majority of the Tribunal held that the vessel "m.v. Tiger Bridge" should not be confiscated under Section 115(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, as there was no evidence of knowledge or connivance by the master/owner/agent in the smuggling activities. They set aside the confiscation order and allowed the appeal. The redemption fine imposed was upheld as reasonable, considering the vessel's involvement in organized smuggling activities. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 May 2012 11:15:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113393 The majority of the Tribunal held that the vessel "m.v. Tiger Bridge" should not be confiscated under Section 115(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, as there was no evidence of knowledge or connivance by the master/owner/agent in the smuggling activities. They set aside the confiscation order and allowed the appeal. The redemption fine imposed was upheld as reasonable, considering the vessel's involvement in organized smuggling activities. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 19 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113393