<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 645 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113381</link>
    <description>The Bench allowed the rectification sought by the party in a case concerning Final Order Nos. 103 to 105/2004. It was found that a typographical error occurred in the order where &quot;Model&quot; was mistakenly used instead of &quot;Parlour Games&quot; under Heading 95.04. The rectification was granted as there was no mistake in the finding portion of the order, aligning with the party&#039;s argument and the Rule of Noscitur A Sociis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 10:50:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 645 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113381</link>
      <description>The Bench allowed the rectification sought by the party in a case concerning Final Order Nos. 103 to 105/2004. It was found that a typographical error occurred in the order where &quot;Model&quot; was mistakenly used instead of &quot;Parlour Games&quot; under Heading 95.04. The rectification was granted as there was no mistake in the finding portion of the order, aligning with the party&#039;s argument and the Rule of Noscitur A Sociis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>