https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113376 A suit seeking injunction against steps initiated under the SARFAESI Act is barred by section 34 even at the stage of a section 13(2) notice, because the statutory scheme excludes civil court intervention in matters covered by the Act and its remedy structure. A vague or general plea of fraud does not avoid that bar; only a clearly pleaded, exceptional case showing fraudulent or wholly untenable action may justify limited civil court interference. The dispute remains one concerning enforcement of security interest and is to be addressed within the statutory forum under section 17. en-us Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Oct 2014 13:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113376 A suit seeking injunction against steps initiated under the SARFAESI Act is barred by section 34 even at the stage of a section 13(2) notice, because the statutory scheme excludes civil court intervention in matters covered by the Act and its remedy structure. A vague or general plea of fraud does not avoid that bar; only a clearly pleaded, exceptional case showing fraudulent or wholly untenable action may justify limited civil court interference. The dispute remains one concerning enforcement of security interest and is to be addressed within the statutory forum under section 17. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113376