https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113373 The Court allowed the petition for restoration of the petitioner company's name under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. Despite defaults in statutory compliances leading to the name being struck off the Register, the Court considered factors such as lack of notice and the company's continued operations. The company was granted relief, with the requirement to fulfill outstanding obligations and payment of fees. The respondent was given the option to pursue penal action for non-compliance. Ultimately, the company's name, directors, and members were reinstated as if the strike-off had not occurred, aligning with the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. en-us Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113373 The Court allowed the petition for restoration of the petitioner company's name under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. Despite defaults in statutory compliances leading to the name being struck off the Register, the Court considered factors such as lack of notice and the company's continued operations. The company was granted relief, with the requirement to fulfill outstanding obligations and payment of fees. The respondent was given the option to pursue penal action for non-compliance. Ultimately, the company's name, directors, and members were reinstated as if the strike-off had not occurred, aligning with the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113373