https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113367 The tribunal set aside the order affirming redemption fine and penalties for non-accountal of goods, ruling in favor of the appellants. It found the delay in posting entries did not justify Rule 25 application as the goods were manufactured from accounted inputs and no attempt was made to remove them unlawfully. The tribunal emphasized the reasonable explanation provided by the appellants and referenced a similar case to support its decision. All appeals were allowed, with consequential relief granted based on the lack of evidence of unaccounted goods or unlawful removal. en-us Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 05 May 2012 10:18:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113367 The tribunal set aside the order affirming redemption fine and penalties for non-accountal of goods, ruling in favor of the appellants. It found the delay in posting entries did not justify Rule 25 application as the goods were manufactured from accounted inputs and no attempt was made to remove them unlawfully. The tribunal emphasized the reasonable explanation provided by the appellants and referenced a similar case to support its decision. All appeals were allowed, with consequential relief granted based on the lack of evidence of unaccounted goods or unlawful removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113367