<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 616 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113365</link>
    <description>Restoration of a company&#039;s name to the Register of Companies was justified where the petition was filed within the statutory 20-year period and the company had been functioning, but the Court required strict compliance because statutory returns, balance sheets and change-of-office intimations had long been neglected. The Court held that restoration could be granted in the interests of justice, while imposing tailored costs under the Companies (Court) Rules rather than limiting costs to ordinary Registrar charges. Restoration was allowed subject to filing all outstanding documents, payment of late fees and charges, exemplary costs to the Official Liquidator&#039;s fund, and payment to the Registrar, with liberty preserved to proceed for any further penal default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 616 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113365</link>
      <description>Restoration of a company&#039;s name to the Register of Companies was justified where the petition was filed within the statutory 20-year period and the company had been functioning, but the Court required strict compliance because statutory returns, balance sheets and change-of-office intimations had long been neglected. The Court held that restoration could be granted in the interests of justice, while imposing tailored costs under the Companies (Court) Rules rather than limiting costs to ordinary Registrar charges. Restoration was allowed subject to filing all outstanding documents, payment of late fees and charges, exemplary costs to the Official Liquidator&#039;s fund, and payment to the Registrar, with liberty preserved to proceed for any further penal default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>