<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 606 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113349</link>
    <description>Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 was interpreted broadly to further transparency and accountability. A body may qualify as a public authority if it is established or constituted by a government notification or order, including a later order that confers status as an authority or institution of self-government. The inclusive limb was read disjunctively, so ownership, control, or substantial financing by the appropriate Government can each independently satisfy the definition without meeting conditions (a) to (d). Applying that approach, the petitioner&#039;s recognition under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and the pervasive statutory control over stock exchanges brought it within section 2(h).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 606 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113349</link>
      <description>Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 was interpreted broadly to further transparency and accountability. A body may qualify as a public authority if it is established or constituted by a government notification or order, including a later order that confers status as an authority or institution of self-government. The inclusive limb was read disjunctively, so ownership, control, or substantial financing by the appropriate Government can each independently satisfy the definition without meeting conditions (a) to (d). Applying that approach, the petitioner&#039;s recognition under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 and the pervasive statutory control over stock exchanges brought it within section 2(h).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>