<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 603 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113344</link>
    <description>An order affecting shareholding and directorship, passed without notice to the affected person, may justify appellate notice and interim protection where denial of hearing is seriously alleged. The Delhi HC noted that the challenge to the Company Law Board&#039;s cancellation order raised a substantial objection on audi alteram partem and that the impugned order should not continue to operate against the appellant pending consideration of the appeal. Notice was therefore directed in the appeal and connected applications, and interim stay was granted in relation to the cancellation of the appellant&#039;s shareholding and directorship.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 11:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 603 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113344</link>
      <description>An order affecting shareholding and directorship, passed without notice to the affected person, may justify appellate notice and interim protection where denial of hearing is seriously alleged. The Delhi HC noted that the challenge to the Company Law Board&#039;s cancellation order raised a substantial objection on audi alteram partem and that the impugned order should not continue to operate against the appellant pending consideration of the appeal. Notice was therefore directed in the appeal and connected applications, and interim stay was granted in relation to the cancellation of the appellant&#039;s shareholding and directorship.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>