<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 589 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113339</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on inputs used to manufacture intermediate goods could not be denied by applying the six-month limit in Rule 57G where the claim was governed by Rule 57J. Rule 57J operated notwithstanding the other rules and did not itself prescribe a time limit for taking credit. As the credit was taken within a period later aligned with a nine-month limit and the delay was not unreasonable, denial of credit was unsustainable. The assessee was therefore entitled to Modvat credit on the job-work inputs used in intermediate goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 18:22:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 589 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113339</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on inputs used to manufacture intermediate goods could not be denied by applying the six-month limit in Rule 57G where the claim was governed by Rule 57J. Rule 57J operated notwithstanding the other rules and did not itself prescribe a time limit for taking credit. As the credit was taken within a period later aligned with a nine-month limit and the delay was not unreasonable, denial of credit was unsustainable. The assessee was therefore entitled to Modvat credit on the job-work inputs used in intermediate goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>