<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 600 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113337</link>
    <description>A struck-off company may be restored to the register where it is shown to be a going concern and restoration is justified in the interests of justice, even if statutory returns and balance-sheets were not filed. The court treated the filing defaults as matters primarily within management responsibility and ordered restoration subject to compliance with outstanding statutory formalities, including payment of costs, late fees and other leviable charges. The striking-off was set aside, with the company, its directors and members restored to the register, while liberty was reserved to proceed separately for any other statutory default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 600 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113337</link>
      <description>A struck-off company may be restored to the register where it is shown to be a going concern and restoration is justified in the interests of justice, even if statutory returns and balance-sheets were not filed. The court treated the filing defaults as matters primarily within management responsibility and ordered restoration subject to compliance with outstanding statutory formalities, including payment of costs, late fees and other leviable charges. The striking-off was set aside, with the company, its directors and members restored to the register, while liberty was reserved to proceed separately for any other statutory default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>