<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 599 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113336</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition for restoration of the company&#039;s name on the Register of Companies under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioners were granted relief based on the company&#039;s active status since incorporation and the lack of proper communication regarding defaults. The court emphasized the need for procedural fairness and granted the restoration subject to compliance with statutory requirements and payment of fees, while allowing the respondent to address any alleged compliance issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 599 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113336</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition for restoration of the company&#039;s name on the Register of Companies under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioners were granted relief based on the company&#039;s active status since incorporation and the lack of proper communication regarding defaults. The court emphasized the need for procedural fairness and granted the restoration subject to compliance with statutory requirements and payment of fees, while allowing the respondent to address any alleged compliance issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>