<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 598 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113335</link>
    <description>A company struck off from the register may be restored where the petition is within the statutory period and the material suggests continuing business activity, making restoration appropriate in the interests of justice. Non-filing of statutory returns and balance sheets was attributed to internal lapse, but the primary responsibility for compliance remained with management rather than an employee alone. Possible defects in the registered office address also supported the case for non-service of notices. At the same time, the company&#039;s negligence in statutory compliance and in keeping the Registrar informed justified restoration only subject to costs and completion of required formalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 598 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113335</link>
      <description>A company struck off from the register may be restored where the petition is within the statutory period and the material suggests continuing business activity, making restoration appropriate in the interests of justice. Non-filing of statutory returns and balance sheets was attributed to internal lapse, but the primary responsibility for compliance remained with management rather than an employee alone. Possible defects in the registered office address also supported the case for non-service of notices. At the same time, the company&#039;s negligence in statutory compliance and in keeping the Registrar informed justified restoration only subject to costs and completion of required formalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>