<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 600 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113325</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the benefit of Notification No. 80/70-Cus. is applicable only to defective articles imported as personal properties of the individual importer. As the goods in question were imported for trading purposes, the appellants were deemed ineligible for duty exemption under the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 18:13:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 600 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113325</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the benefit of Notification No. 80/70-Cus. is applicable only to defective articles imported as personal properties of the individual importer. As the goods in question were imported for trading purposes, the appellants were deemed ineligible for duty exemption under the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>