<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 599 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113324</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the denial of Modvat credit on cement, upholding the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision. The main issue was the validity of endorsed invoices for Modvat purposes, with reference to a relevant case law. The appellant&#039;s jurisdictional objections were rejected as untimely, having acquiesced to the jurisdiction earlier. The appeal filed by the department was questioned for being beyond the statutory period, but the appellant was deemed to have waived this objection. The importance of timely raising jurisdictional objections was emphasized, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 18:12:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 599 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113324</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the denial of Modvat credit on cement, upholding the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision. The main issue was the validity of endorsed invoices for Modvat purposes, with reference to a relevant case law. The appellant&#039;s jurisdictional objections were rejected as untimely, having acquiesced to the jurisdiction earlier. The appeal filed by the department was questioned for being beyond the statutory period, but the appellant was deemed to have waived this objection. The importance of timely raising jurisdictional objections was emphasized, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>