<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 682 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113323</link>
    <description>The court sanctioned the scheme of arrangement proposed by the petitioner-company under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, subject to modifications and undertakings provided by the company. The Registrar of Companies&#039; objections regarding accounting standards and compliance with section 211 of the Act were addressed through the company&#039;s undertakings and disclosures. The court emphasized the scheme&#039;s fairness, legality, and compliance with public policy, referencing relevant case law. Ultimately, the court approved the scheme with the specified modifications and directed the petitioner-company to serve the order on the Registrar of Companies within 30 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 682 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113323</link>
      <description>The court sanctioned the scheme of arrangement proposed by the petitioner-company under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, subject to modifications and undertakings provided by the company. The Registrar of Companies&#039; objections regarding accounting standards and compliance with section 211 of the Act were addressed through the company&#039;s undertakings and disclosures. The court emphasized the scheme&#039;s fairness, legality, and compliance with public policy, referencing relevant case law. Ultimately, the court approved the scheme with the specified modifications and directed the petitioner-company to serve the order on the Registrar of Companies within 30 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>