<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 679 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113315</link>
    <description>Section 14 assistance for taking possession of secured assets was treated as an enabling, non-adjudicatory step in aid of enforcement under the SARFAESI framework, so no separate notice under section 13(4) or additional natural justice hearing was required at that stage. The borrower&#039;s remedies under sections 17 and 18 remained available against actual enforcement measures, and the writ challenge failed. The assignment of the debt to a reconstruction company was also upheld because section 5 permits acquisition of financial assets with overriding effect, making the assignee competent to enforce the security interest as lawful transferee of the secured creditor&#039;s rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 679 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113315</link>
      <description>Section 14 assistance for taking possession of secured assets was treated as an enabling, non-adjudicatory step in aid of enforcement under the SARFAESI framework, so no separate notice under section 13(4) or additional natural justice hearing was required at that stage. The borrower&#039;s remedies under sections 17 and 18 remained available against actual enforcement measures, and the writ challenge failed. The assignment of the debt to a reconstruction company was also upheld because section 5 permits acquisition of financial assets with overriding effect, making the assignee competent to enforce the security interest as lawful transferee of the secured creditor&#039;s rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>