<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 589 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113299</link>
    <description>The case involved the disallowance of modvat credit by the Commissioner (Appeals) without granting a hearing opportunity to the appellants. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal based solely on procedural irregularities without examining the facts or providing a fair chance for the appellants to present their case. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to natural justice principles, highlighting the necessity for a thorough examination of facts and ensuring a fair hearing process. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a proper hearing and a reasoned decision by the Deputy Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 17:29:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 589 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113299</link>
      <description>The case involved the disallowance of modvat credit by the Commissioner (Appeals) without granting a hearing opportunity to the appellants. The Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal based solely on procedural irregularities without examining the facts or providing a fair chance for the appellants to present their case. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to natural justice principles, highlighting the necessity for a thorough examination of facts and ensuring a fair hearing process. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a proper hearing and a reasoned decision by the Deputy Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>