<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 585 - CESTAT, new delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113295</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in a case concerning the determination of Annual Capacity of Production (ACP) for duty liability under the Compounded Levy Scheme. The appellants&#039; appeal challenging the exclusion of galleries from ACP calculation and refund claim was dismissed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the finality of orders, lack of excess duty payment, and adherence to legal principles, including Supreme Court rulings on refund claims and the need to challenge orders through proper avenues. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellants&#039; contentions, ultimately agreeing with the Commissioner&#039;s decision and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 17:05:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 585 - CESTAT, new delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113295</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision in a case concerning the determination of Annual Capacity of Production (ACP) for duty liability under the Compounded Levy Scheme. The appellants&#039; appeal challenging the exclusion of galleries from ACP calculation and refund claim was dismissed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the finality of orders, lack of excess duty payment, and adherence to legal principles, including Supreme Court rulings on refund claims and the need to challenge orders through proper avenues. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellants&#039; contentions, ultimately agreeing with the Commissioner&#039;s decision and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>