<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 580 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113284</link>
    <description>Modvat credit attributable to inputs used in goods cleared at nil duty had to be reversed where the assessee&#039;s classification list treated spent sulphuric acid as a product and no rectification was sought. The registration certificate describing it as a by-product was insufficient to displace the departmental record, and the contrary plea was treated as an afterthought. As the assessee manufactured acid slurry and spent sulphuric acid as products and cleared the latter without proportionate reversal of credit, the conditions of Rule 57CC(1) were attracted. Reversal of 8% of the value of the nil-rated clearances was therefore required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 16:57:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 580 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113284</link>
      <description>Modvat credit attributable to inputs used in goods cleared at nil duty had to be reversed where the assessee&#039;s classification list treated spent sulphuric acid as a product and no rectification was sought. The registration certificate describing it as a by-product was insufficient to displace the departmental record, and the contrary plea was treated as an afterthought. As the assessee manufactured acid slurry and spent sulphuric acid as products and cleared the latter without proportionate reversal of credit, the conditions of Rule 57CC(1) were attracted. Reversal of 8% of the value of the nil-rated clearances was therefore required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>