<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 572 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113273</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai admitted both appeals together and waived the pre-deposit of the credit amount. The tribunal found that deficiency in dealer registration does not affect credit and stayed recovery until the appeal disposal. The case was scheduled for regular hearing on 26-2-2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 16:41:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 572 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113273</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai admitted both appeals together and waived the pre-deposit of the credit amount. The tribunal found that deficiency in dealer registration does not affect credit and stayed recovery until the appeal disposal. The case was scheduled for regular hearing on 26-2-2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>