https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113267 An appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 was unavailable against Company Law Board orders made on applications under sections 45 and 50 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The text explains that such orders were passed in the arbitration referral context, not while deciding the substantive oppression and mismanagement petitions under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. Section 50 creates a limited statutory appeal only from the orders it specifies, and section 10F cannot independently create a right of appeal where section 50 does not permit one. The practical effect is that a referral order allowing arbitration could not be challenged through the invoked statutory appeal. en-us Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113267 An appeal under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 was unavailable against Company Law Board orders made on applications under sections 45 and 50 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The text explains that such orders were passed in the arbitration referral context, not while deciding the substantive oppression and mismanagement petitions under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. Section 50 creates a limited statutory appeal only from the orders it specifies, and section 10F cannot independently create a right of appeal where section 50 does not permit one. The practical effect is that a referral order allowing arbitration could not be challenged through the invoked statutory appeal. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 02 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113267