<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 539 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113255</link>
    <description>A prima facie case supported waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a valuation dispute based on alleged related-party dealings, advertisement expenses, trade advance and limitation. Mere familial links between some partners of the distributor and the company&#039;s directors were insufficient to establish a related-party relationship. Advertisement expenditure by the distributor and payment of trade advance, without evidence showing how they affected price or established a flow-back, did not by themselves displace arm&#039;s length valuation or justify inclusion in assessable value. The record also showed a prima facie limitation issue. On that basis, recovery was stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 15:29:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 539 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113255</link>
      <description>A prima facie case supported waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a valuation dispute based on alleged related-party dealings, advertisement expenses, trade advance and limitation. Mere familial links between some partners of the distributor and the company&#039;s directors were insufficient to establish a related-party relationship. Advertisement expenditure by the distributor and payment of trade advance, without evidence showing how they affected price or established a flow-back, did not by themselves displace arm&#039;s length valuation or justify inclusion in assessable value. The record also showed a prima facie limitation issue. On that basis, recovery was stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>