<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 87 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113246</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition based on non-payment of dues and disputes over machinery supply and installation. Despite partial payments, the respondent company disputed the debt, citing issues with machinery quality and functionality. The court noted the lack of acknowledgment of alleged dues and emphasized resolving the dispute through civil court proceedings for a conclusive determination of outstanding dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 87 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113246</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition based on non-payment of dues and disputes over machinery supply and installation. Despite partial payments, the respondent company disputed the debt, citing issues with machinery quality and functionality. The court noted the lack of acknowledgment of alleged dues and emphasized resolving the dispute through civil court proceedings for a conclusive determination of outstanding dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>