<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 84 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113239</link>
    <description>An authorised dealer or money-changer must comply with the statutory duties under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act independently of internal instructions in the money-changer memorandum, because those instructions cannot override the Act or dilute obligations to verify authority and obtain reasonable declarations. Free inter-money-changer transactions remain subject to statutory restrictions, including the prohibition on unauthorised exchange rates. The text also states that adjudicatory penalty for foreign exchange contravention is attracted on proof of breach of the regulatory obligation, and mens rea is not required in the criminal law sense. On that basis, the contravention and penalty were maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 19:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 84 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113239</link>
      <description>An authorised dealer or money-changer must comply with the statutory duties under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act independently of internal instructions in the money-changer memorandum, because those instructions cannot override the Act or dilute obligations to verify authority and obtain reasonable declarations. Free inter-money-changer transactions remain subject to statutory restrictions, including the prohibition on unauthorised exchange rates. The text also states that adjudicatory penalty for foreign exchange contravention is attracted on proof of breach of the regulatory obligation, and mens rea is not required in the criminal law sense. On that basis, the contravention and penalty were maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>