https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113236 The repeal and saving provisions distinguish between adjudicatory "cases" pending before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission and incomplete investigations pending before the Director General. A matter in which only a preliminary investigation had been directed, and no report had yet been placed before the Commission, remained an unfinished investigative exercise rather than a pending case for adjudication. Section 66(6) of the Competition Act therefore applied to such investigations and validly carried them over to the Competition Commission of India. The transfer of the pending investigation was accordingly upheld as lawful. en-us Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113236 The repeal and saving provisions distinguish between adjudicatory "cases" pending before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission and incomplete investigations pending before the Director General. A matter in which only a preliminary investigation had been directed, and no report had yet been placed before the Commission, remained an unfinished investigative exercise rather than a pending case for adjudication. Section 66(6) of the Competition Act therefore applied to such investigations and validly carried them over to the Competition Commission of India. The transfer of the pending investigation was accordingly upheld as lawful. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 06 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113236