https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113221 Recall of a stay order requiring pre-deposit was refused because the assessee failed to show non-service of the hearing notice, and the postal acknowledgment supported due service. Financial hardship and efforts to restart production did not justify non-appearance before the Tribunal. The Tribunal also noted that the underlying demand had already been upheld by the High Court and no stay had been granted by the Supreme Court. On these facts, the application to recall the stay order was rejected against the assessee. en-us Thu, 13 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 May 2012 13:36:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113221 Recall of a stay order requiring pre-deposit was refused because the assessee failed to show non-service of the hearing notice, and the postal acknowledgment supported due service. Financial hardship and efforts to restart production did not justify non-appearance before the Tribunal. The Tribunal also noted that the underlying demand had already been upheld by the High Court and no stay had been granted by the Supreme Court. On these facts, the application to recall the stay order was rejected against the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113221