<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 559 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113214</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on lead-tin alloy was treated as allowable where the assessee had declared lead and tin as inputs and had also indicated use of lead alloy in manufacture of radiators. The discussion held that Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was substantially complied with because the disputed alloy had a clear nexus with the declared inputs and fell within the same tariff description. The analysis followed the earlier Tribunal approach that credit should not be denied merely because the exact alloy was not separately declared when its use and tariff classification were sufficiently covered by the declaration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 13:17:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 559 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113214</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on lead-tin alloy was treated as allowable where the assessee had declared lead and tin as inputs and had also indicated use of lead alloy in manufacture of radiators. The discussion held that Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was substantially complied with because the disputed alloy had a clear nexus with the declared inputs and fell within the same tariff description. The analysis followed the earlier Tribunal approach that credit should not be denied merely because the exact alloy was not separately declared when its use and tariff classification were sufficiently covered by the declaration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>