<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 231 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113209</link>
    <description>A complaint can be quashed under section 482 CrPC where the allegations, even if taken at face value, do not disclose the essential ingredients of the alleged offences. Cheating requires specific averments of fraudulent or dishonest inducement at the time of the promise, and mere breach of contract or later non-performance is insufficient; here, no such inducement was pleaded and the complainant&#039;s own case showed awareness of the supplier&#039;s financial difficulty. Criminal breach of trust requires entrustment and dishonest misappropriation or conversion, but no entrustment was shown. With the foundational offences absent, the allegation of conspiracy also fell away, and the complaint did not disclose a prima facie case under the IPC provisions mentioned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 18:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 231 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113209</link>
      <description>A complaint can be quashed under section 482 CrPC where the allegations, even if taken at face value, do not disclose the essential ingredients of the alleged offences. Cheating requires specific averments of fraudulent or dishonest inducement at the time of the promise, and mere breach of contract or later non-performance is insufficient; here, no such inducement was pleaded and the complainant&#039;s own case showed awareness of the supplier&#039;s financial difficulty. Criminal breach of trust requires entrustment and dishonest misappropriation or conversion, but no entrustment was shown. With the foundational offences absent, the allegation of conspiracy also fell away, and the complaint did not disclose a prima facie case under the IPC provisions mentioned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>