<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 544 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113183</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the stay order for deposit amount, allowing M/s. Sterlite Optical Technologies Ltd. to proceed with the appeal without the pre-deposit condition. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s arguments based on a favorable decision in another case and a High Court order requiring a bank guarantee, which covered the disputed duty amount. The Revenue confirmed the bank guarantee covered the disputed duty amount, leading to the modification of the stay order. The appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application was allowed, ensuring the validity of the bank guarantee throughout the Tribunal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 12:11:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 544 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113183</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the stay order for deposit amount, allowing M/s. Sterlite Optical Technologies Ltd. to proceed with the appeal without the pre-deposit condition. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s arguments based on a favorable decision in another case and a High Court order requiring a bank guarantee, which covered the disputed duty amount. The Revenue confirmed the bank guarantee covered the disputed duty amount, leading to the modification of the stay order. The appellant&#039;s miscellaneous application was allowed, ensuring the validity of the bank guarantee throughout the Tribunal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>