<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 543 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113182</link>
    <description>A pre-deposit waiver was granted in an interim appeal where the dispute concerned valuation and a claim of revenue neutrality within the same company&#039;s manufacturing units. The record showed substantial duty had already been paid from PLA at one unit, and on the department&#039;s proposed valuation that payment would not have arisen if duty had been discharged at the other unit. Because the appellants made out a strong prima facie case and insisting on pre-deposit would create an unnecessary financial burden, complete waiver was allowed and recovery of the disputed demand was stayed pending final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 12:10:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 543 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113182</link>
      <description>A pre-deposit waiver was granted in an interim appeal where the dispute concerned valuation and a claim of revenue neutrality within the same company&#039;s manufacturing units. The record showed substantial duty had already been paid from PLA at one unit, and on the department&#039;s proposed valuation that payment would not have arisen if duty had been discharged at the other unit. Because the appellants made out a strong prima facie case and insisting on pre-deposit would create an unnecessary financial burden, complete waiver was allowed and recovery of the disputed demand was stayed pending final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>