<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 184 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113163</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order due to failure to consider relevant factors and allegations of bias. Mr. Monoranjan Sen was appointed as the Empanelled Auditor to audit the accounts for specified periods. The appeal was allowed, granting liberty to parties to approach the Company Law Board for implementation. The operation of the judgment and order was stayed for three weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 184 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113163</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order due to failure to consider relevant factors and allegations of bias. Mr. Monoranjan Sen was appointed as the Empanelled Auditor to audit the accounts for specified periods. The appeal was allowed, granting liberty to parties to approach the Company Law Board for implementation. The operation of the judgment and order was stayed for three weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>