<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 181 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113158</link>
    <description>In company liquidation, realised sale proceeds must be distributed under the mandatory priority scheme in section 529A of the Companies Act, with workmen&#039;s dues and secured creditors taking precedence. Rule 179 of the Companies (Court) Rules permits subsequent interest only where a surplus remains after full payment of admitted claims. Section 19(19) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act also requires distribution in accordance with section 529A. A claim rejection made without following this statutory sequence is unsustainable and must be reconsidered under the proper liquidation priorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 181 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113158</link>
      <description>In company liquidation, realised sale proceeds must be distributed under the mandatory priority scheme in section 529A of the Companies Act, with workmen&#039;s dues and secured creditors taking precedence. Rule 179 of the Companies (Court) Rules permits subsequent interest only where a surplus remains after full payment of admitted claims. Section 19(19) of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act also requires distribution in accordance with section 529A. A claim rejection made without following this statutory sequence is unsustainable and must be reconsidered under the proper liquidation priorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>