https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113155 A criminal complaint under sections 63 and 628 of the Companies Act, 1956 could not be quashed under section 482 CrPC on a limitation objection where the starting point of limitation depended on when the Registrar of Companies acquired knowledge of the alleged false statement. The Court treated limitation as a mixed question of law and fact and held that it could not resolve disputed factual issues at the quashing stage without evidence. The petitioner was left to raise the limitation plea before the trial court during trial. en-us Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Sep 2014 13:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113155 A criminal complaint under sections 63 and 628 of the Companies Act, 1956 could not be quashed under section 482 CrPC on a limitation objection where the starting point of limitation depended on when the Registrar of Companies acquired knowledge of the alleged false statement. The Court treated limitation as a mixed question of law and fact and held that it could not resolve disputed factual issues at the quashing stage without evidence. The petitioner was left to raise the limitation plea before the trial court during trial. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 25 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113155