https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113153 The court declined to quash the summoning order in a case involving a Criminal Complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner, a director of a family-held company, argued lack of involvement in the company's affairs. However, the court found the complaint sufficiently clear regarding his responsibilities, rejecting the petition to quash. Emphasizing the need for presenting defenses before the trial court, the judgment highlighted the petitioner's opportunity to seek discharge based on specific grounds and present evidence during the proceedings before the Metropolitan Magistrate. en-us Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 26 Sep 2014 18:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113153 The court declined to quash the summoning order in a case involving a Criminal Complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner, a director of a family-held company, argued lack of involvement in the company's affairs. However, the court found the complaint sufficiently clear regarding his responsibilities, rejecting the petition to quash. Emphasizing the need for presenting defenses before the trial court, the judgment highlighted the petitioner's opportunity to seek discharge based on specific grounds and present evidence during the proceedings before the Metropolitan Magistrate. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 20 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113153