https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113150 Condonation of delay requires a cause that is both genuine and sufficient; a mere explanation for lateness is not enough. In this matter, confusion between partners over restoration of an appeal after dismissal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was held not to amount to sufficient cause for a delay of 7 months and 10 days. The application for condonation was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed as time-barred. en-us Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 May 2012 10:38:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113150 Condonation of delay requires a cause that is both genuine and sufficient; a mere explanation for lateness is not enough. In this matter, confusion between partners over restoration of an appeal after dismissal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was held not to amount to sufficient cause for a delay of 7 months and 10 days. The application for condonation was rejected, and the appeal was dismissed as time-barred. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113150