https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113137 Waiver of pre-deposit was refused where the duty liability was undisputed and no prima facie case was shown in favour of the appellants. The claim of financial hardship was held insufficient to justify stay of recovery, particularly because Government dues have priority. The request that recovery should first proceed by sale of machinery was also declined in a stay matter under the pre-deposit provision. The appellants were directed to deposit the entire duty amount within the stipulated time, while waiver of penalty and stay of recovery would operate only upon compliance. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 May 2012 10:14:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113137 Waiver of pre-deposit was refused where the duty liability was undisputed and no prima facie case was shown in favour of the appellants. The claim of financial hardship was held insufficient to justify stay of recovery, particularly because Government dues have priority. The request that recovery should first proceed by sale of machinery was also declined in a stay matter under the pre-deposit provision. The appellants were directed to deposit the entire duty amount within the stipulated time, while waiver of penalty and stay of recovery would operate only upon compliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113137