<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 429 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113135</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld that M/s. Pahawa Chemicals (P) Ltd. were not entitled to the small scale exemption under Notification No. 16/97-C.E. due to the use of a foreign brand name. Additionally, it confirmed the validity of the Show Cause Notice issued by the Superintendent, stating it was within the normal period of limitation and fell under the Superintendent&#039;s jurisdiction. The appeal was rejected based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 10:12:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 429 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113135</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld that M/s. Pahawa Chemicals (P) Ltd. were not entitled to the small scale exemption under Notification No. 16/97-C.E. due to the use of a foreign brand name. Additionally, it confirmed the validity of the Show Cause Notice issued by the Superintendent, stating it was within the normal period of limitation and fell under the Superintendent&#039;s jurisdiction. The appeal was rejected based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>