<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 166 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113129</link>
    <description>The court directed the Registrar of Companies to strike off the name of the petitioner-company from the register within eight weeks based on the statutory deeming provision and documentation provided. The writ petition challenging General Circular No. 13 of 2003 was dismissed as the circular was no longer in force, rendering the petition infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 166 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113129</link>
      <description>The court directed the Registrar of Companies to strike off the name of the petitioner-company from the register within eight weeks based on the statutory deeming provision and documentation provided. The writ petition challenging General Circular No. 13 of 2003 was dismissed as the circular was no longer in force, rendering the petition infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>