https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113128 Repeated assertions that officers visited different offices but could not obtain the papers were held not to amount to a satisfactory explanation for delay in filing the Revenue's appeals. The explanation was treated as a repetitive account of ineffectual efforts, insufficient to justify condonation. As a result, condonation of delay was refused, and the stay petitions and appeals were rejected as not maintainable. en-us Wed, 17 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 May 2012 18:45:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113128 Repeated assertions that officers visited different offices but could not obtain the papers were held not to amount to a satisfactory explanation for delay in filing the Revenue's appeals. The explanation was treated as a repetitive account of ineffectual efforts, insufficient to justify condonation. As a result, condonation of delay was refused, and the stay petitions and appeals were rejected as not maintainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 17 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113128