<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 624 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113125</link>
    <description>Notional interest on deposits collected from prospective buyers and dealers was held not includible in the assessable value unless the department proved a nexus between the interest element and the manufacturing or clearance activity. The record showed no evidence linking the deposits to the value of the goods, so the burden of establishing includibility was not discharged. On that basis, the valuation claim failed and the notional interest could not be added to assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 18:40:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150141" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 624 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113125</link>
      <description>Notional interest on deposits collected from prospective buyers and dealers was held not includible in the assessable value unless the department proved a nexus between the interest element and the manufacturing or clearance activity. The record showed no evidence linking the deposits to the value of the goods, so the burden of establishing includibility was not discharged. On that basis, the valuation claim failed and the notional interest could not be added to assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>