https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113100 A company court exercising winding-up jurisdiction may refuse a disclaimer application and permit the landlord to proceed in the company court where the dispute concerns alleged unlawful sub-letting and questions arising in the winding up under section 446(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. The alleged creation of sub-tenancy without prior written consent, which could constitute a ground for eviction under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, justified inquiry in the winding-up forum. Because the official liquidator did not place material showing whether written consent had been obtained, the refusal of disclaimer and grant of liberty to sue were upheld as within jurisdiction. en-us Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Oct 2014 08:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113100 A company court exercising winding-up jurisdiction may refuse a disclaimer application and permit the landlord to proceed in the company court where the dispute concerns alleged unlawful sub-letting and questions arising in the winding up under section 446(2) of the Companies Act, 1956. The alleged creation of sub-tenancy without prior written consent, which could constitute a ground for eviction under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, justified inquiry in the winding-up forum. Because the official liquidator did not place material showing whether written consent had been obtained, the refusal of disclaimer and grant of liberty to sue were upheld as within jurisdiction. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113100