<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 268 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113093</link>
    <description>IFCI Limited was treated as a public financial institution for section 4A of the Companies Act, 1956, bringing it within the definition of a financial institution under section 2(1)(m) of the SARFAESI Act. The phrase &quot;established or constituted by or under&quot; a Central Act was read broadly, so statutory continuity was not broken by later incorporation under the Companies Act. The proviso requiring not less than fifty-one per cent Government-held or controlled paid-up share capital was held to be a condition precedent assessed on the date of notification, not a continuing condition. Later reduction in Government control did not invalidate the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 08:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 268 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113093</link>
      <description>IFCI Limited was treated as a public financial institution for section 4A of the Companies Act, 1956, bringing it within the definition of a financial institution under section 2(1)(m) of the SARFAESI Act. The phrase &quot;established or constituted by or under&quot; a Central Act was read broadly, so statutory continuity was not broken by later incorporation under the Companies Act. The proviso requiring not less than fifty-one per cent Government-held or controlled paid-up share capital was held to be a condition precedent assessed on the date of notification, not a continuing condition. Later reduction in Government control did not invalidate the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>