<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 266 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113090</link>
    <description>Noodles packed in printed plastic film sachets with tastemaker were treated as goods put up in unit containers and ordinarily intended for sale, because the form-fill-seal process produced sealed, individual packs bearing manufacturing particulars, batch details, price and net weight. The tariff entry under heading 19.02 was applied by construing &quot;unit container&quot; in light of the object of the classification scheme and the retail-sale character of standard packs. Flexible sachets designed to hold a predetermined quantity were accepted as unit containers. The goods were therefore classifiable under sub-heading 1902.10, not 1902.90, restoring the classification in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:09:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 266 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113090</link>
      <description>Noodles packed in printed plastic film sachets with tastemaker were treated as goods put up in unit containers and ordinarily intended for sale, because the form-fill-seal process produced sealed, individual packs bearing manufacturing particulars, batch details, price and net weight. The tariff entry under heading 19.02 was applied by construing &quot;unit container&quot; in light of the object of the classification scheme and the retail-sale character of standard packs. Flexible sachets designed to hold a predetermined quantity were accepted as unit containers. The goods were therefore classifiable under sub-heading 1902.10, not 1902.90, restoring the classification in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>