<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 306 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113084</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of &#039;U&#039; bolts under Item 52 Central Excise Tariff based on their primary function as fasteners, despite serving other purposes in the leaf spring assembly of motor vehicles. The appeal was rejected, affirming the Collector (Appeals) order, as the &#039;U&#039; bolts were deemed to be appropriately classified under Item 52 Central Excise Tariff, in line with established legal principles and previous judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:48:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 306 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113084</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of &#039;U&#039; bolts under Item 52 Central Excise Tariff based on their primary function as fasteners, despite serving other purposes in the leaf spring assembly of motor vehicles. The appeal was rejected, affirming the Collector (Appeals) order, as the &#039;U&#039; bolts were deemed to be appropriately classified under Item 52 Central Excise Tariff, in line with established legal principles and previous judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>