<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 300 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113078</link>
    <description>Application sought directions for convening, holding and conducting meetings to consider a scheme of amalgamation between two companies. The court directed separate meetings of equity shareholders, unsecured creditors and secured creditors, required advance notices, advertisements and proxy forms, and appointed a Chairman with specified remuneration and powers to issue notices, determine disputed valuations using company books and report results to court verified by affidavit within seven days. Voting by proxy was permitted subject to filing, and the application was disposed of in accordance with these procedural directions affecting stakeholder approval and valuation processes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:15:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 300 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113078</link>
      <description>Application sought directions for convening, holding and conducting meetings to consider a scheme of amalgamation between two companies. The court directed separate meetings of equity shareholders, unsecured creditors and secured creditors, required advance notices, advertisements and proxy forms, and appointed a Chairman with specified remuneration and powers to issue notices, determine disputed valuations using company books and report results to court verified by affidavit within seven days. Voting by proxy was permitted subject to filing, and the application was disposed of in accordance with these procedural directions affecting stakeholder approval and valuation processes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>