<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 439 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113077</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellants and affirming their entitlement to the small-scale exemption. The Tribunal determined that the mark &#039;centaur&#039; used on the medicines was a house mark and not a brand name, thus not disqualifying the appellants from the exemption. By drawing on relevant case law and definitions of brand names and trademarks, the Tribunal concluded that the appellants could use &#039;centaur&#039; as a house mark without forfeiting the small-scale exemption for their manufactured medicines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:27:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 439 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113077</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellants and affirming their entitlement to the small-scale exemption. The Tribunal determined that the mark &#039;centaur&#039; used on the medicines was a house mark and not a brand name, thus not disqualifying the appellants from the exemption. By drawing on relevant case law and definitions of brand names and trademarks, the Tribunal concluded that the appellants could use &#039;centaur&#039; as a house mark without forfeiting the small-scale exemption for their manufactured medicines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>