<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (8) TMI 488 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113070</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the extension of stay of recovery requested by the appellants due to the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s premature appropriation of the sanctioned rebate amount towards the duty confirmed against the assessee, which was still appealable. The Tribunal found the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s actions unjust and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest, emphasizing the need to uphold principles of justice. Referring to a previous decision, the Tribunal exercised its inherent jurisdiction to extend the stay of recovery during the appeal process, ensuring fairness and protection of all parties&#039; interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 15:45:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=150086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (8) TMI 488 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113070</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the extension of stay of recovery requested by the appellants due to the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s premature appropriation of the sanctioned rebate amount towards the duty confirmed against the assessee, which was still appealable. The Tribunal found the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s actions unjust and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interest, emphasizing the need to uphold principles of justice. Referring to a previous decision, the Tribunal exercised its inherent jurisdiction to extend the stay of recovery during the appeal process, ensuring fairness and protection of all parties&#039; interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>