https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113068 The Court allowed the application for deletion of the first respondent's name and dropped the misfeasance proceedings under Section 543 due to the lack of specific allegations against the respondents. It emphasized the necessity of detailed allegations in misfeasance proceedings and upheld the maintainability of an application under Order 7, Rule 11 at any stage before the conclusion of the trial. en-us Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Dec 2014 15:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113068 The Court allowed the application for deletion of the first respondent's name and dropped the misfeasance proceedings under Section 543 due to the lack of specific allegations against the respondents. It emphasized the necessity of detailed allegations in misfeasance proceedings and upheld the maintainability of an application under Order 7, Rule 11 at any stage before the conclusion of the trial. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113068