https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113055 The appeals were filed against duty demands and penalties imposed on two companies. The court found that the chemical examiner's report lacked clarity and was inconclusive, leading to the denial of re-examination requests. Demanding duty under a different provision without denying the compounded levy scheme benefit was deemed unjustified. As a result, the court set aside the impugned orders, ruling in favor of the appellants and providing consequential relief as per law. en-us Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 May 2012 15:28:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113055 The appeals were filed against duty demands and penalties imposed on two companies. The court found that the chemical examiner's report lacked clarity and was inconclusive, leading to the denial of re-examination requests. Demanding duty under a different provision without denying the compounded levy scheme benefit was deemed unjustified. As a result, the court set aside the impugned orders, ruling in favor of the appellants and providing consequential relief as per law. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113055